Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 18 OF 2014

Case between M/s. Bharathi Auto Finance vs Tharayamkandathil Shaji regarding money realization

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju V.G., B.Sc., LL.B.
Order Date
2014-07-16
Duration
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff, a partnership firm, sought repayment of a vehicle loan amount after defendant issued a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds. Despite multiple notices, defendant failed to pay the amount, leading to the plaintiff filing a suit for recovery.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Recovery of Rs.69,200 with interest at 6% per annum and costs
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Recovery
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence, including the bounced cheque, return memo, lawyer notice, and postal acknowledgment, demonstrating the defendant's failure to fulfill the repayment.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaintiff adduced cogent and reliable evidence, including the bounced cheque, return memo from the bank, lawyer notice, and postal acknowledgment, which remained unchallenged due to the defendant's absence.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. Bharathi Auto Finance (Age not specified years) Door 26/175L, 204, 1st Floor, Nusrath Complex, Naduvilangadi, Tirur amsom, desom, PO. Pookkayil Bazar, Tirur Taluk R. Rajamani (41 years) Naduvilangadi, PO. Pookkayil Bazar, Tirur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Tharayamkandathil Shaji (Age not specified years) Nadivulangadi, PO. Pookkayil Bazar, Tirur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk, PIN 676 107

Reliefs

Relief Type: Money Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of Rs.69,200 with interest at 6% per annum and costs
Evidence:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence, including the bounced cheque, return memo, lawyer notice, and postal acknowledgment, demonstrating the defendant's failure to fulfill the repayment.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrated the loan repayment amount and subsequent dishonor
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided proof of the cheque being returned due to insufficient funds
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notified the defendant of the dishonored cheque and requested repayment
Reference:
A3
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidenced the defendant's acknowledgment of the lawyer notice
Reference:
A4

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases