Case between Mathew Mammen vs Kent Mahal Owners Association et al regarding ad-interim injunction

Case Summary

Mathew Mammen has filed a petition for an ad-interim injunction against the Kent Mahal Owners Association to prevent them from conducting elections until further orders. The court found that without this injunction, irreparable harm could be caused to the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Temporary ad-interim injunction

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

No

The court issued an ad-interim injunction preventing the defendants from holding elections until further orders.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case justifying the grant of the injunction.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case justifying the grant of an ad-interim injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an ad-interim exparte injunction order is passed as follows: The defendants / respondents are temporarily restraining from conducting election to the Kent Mahal Owners Association on 23/11/2024 or any other date against the provisions of the bye laws, until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Mathew Mammen
Party Age: 65
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kent Mahal Owners Association
Party Age: 74
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mrs.Mily George
Party Age: 49

Plaintiffs Documents

Affidavit and the documents produced.

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: E.S.M Kabeer, Sheeba C and Aisha Beevi Azeez
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

An ad-interim exparte injunction order is passed restraining the defendants from conducting election to the Kent Mahal Owners Association.

Evidence: