Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 652/2025

Case between Mathew Joseph vs Ebby Thomas regarding temporary injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-07-02
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mathew Joseph, is seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the defendant, Ebby Thomas, from transferring any portion of his property. The court has determined that granting the injunction is necessary to avoid irreparable injury to the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has issued an interim injunction preventing the defendant from transferring property until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction against transferring property
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court has issued an interim injunction preventing the defendant from transferring property until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff made out a prima facie case and that not granting the injunction would likely cause irreparable injury.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the plaintiff made out a prima facie case and that not granting the injunction would likely cause irreparable injury.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case and if order of temporary injunction is not granted, irreparable injury is likely to be caused to the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondent from transferring any portion of his property (plaint item No. 5 property) by annexing portions of plaint item No.1 property until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mathew Joseph
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ebby Thomas
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K Shaji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Beena N Kartha
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arunchand
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bharat Vijay P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kevin James
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gopika Gopal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Minu Vittorria Paulson
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Archana P P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ren Shibu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shehroon patel A K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Issac Melvin B O
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Frijo K Sundaram
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bincy Jose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aravind Ajith
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P B Malini Rao
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Fadiya Farza V A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Unnimaya M R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nigil Shanly
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interim injunction restraining the respondent from transferring any portion of his property.
Evidence:
Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondent from transferring any portion of his property (plaint item No. 5 property) by annexing portions of plaint item No.1 property until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mathew Joseph vs Ebby Thomas regarding temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mathew Joseph vs Ebby Thomas regarding temporary injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Santharam et al vs R. Ramesh et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between V. N Ranganathan vs Sajeevan et al regarding injunction and consequential relief
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Jose John vs Golden Metro Apartment Owners Association et al regarding violations of association bylaws and waste collection
MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between K.S. Vinod vs Dr. S. Satish Bhat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Shyju Antony vs The Apostolic Administrator et al regarding appointments of Chancellor & Finance Officer
The Court of the Munsiff, Ernakulam
Injunction Defendant Won