Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
EP 125/2014

Case between Managing Partner Sooraj Bankers vs Vijayan et al regarding petition dismissal

Court
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Sri. Biju.V.G
Order Date
2014-10-09
Duration
0 years, 6 months, 11 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Managing Partner of Sooraj Bankers filed a petition which was dismissed due to absence of the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed with cost due to the absence of the Managing Partner Sooraj Bankers.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Petition Dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit - Petition Dismissal
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Counsel for petitioner submitted that he has no instruction from his client. Name of petitioner called. He is absent. Hence the petition is dismissed with cost.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Managing Partner Sooraj Bankers (Age not specified years) Muttannur, Purathur Amsom, rep. by POA K.Sethumadhavan, So Apputty, Kalavankode House, Kavilakkad, Purathur Post

Defendants

Vijayan (Age not specified years) Aliyath House, Chennara Amsom, Valamaruthur Desom, Post Chennara Sathyan (Age not specified years) Maneriyil House, Purathur Amsom, Muttannur Desom and Post

Reliefs

Relief Type: Petition Dismissal
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The petition filed by Managing Partner Sooraj Bankers was dismissed due to absence.
Evidence:
Counsel for petitioner submitted that he has no instruction from his client. Name of petitioner called. He is absent. Hence the petition is dismissed with cost.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
Case Filed
Sat, 03/29/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases