Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P.No.95/2022

Case between K.Vasantha vs V.Rajesh regarding rent control dispute

Court
Rent Control Court
Judge
Smt.Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-03-18
Duration
Case Code No.
95
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.Vasantha, the petitioner, was engaged in a rent control dispute with V.Rajesh, the counter petitioner. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution when the petitioner failed to appear for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to appear in court to present evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner failed to appear in court to present evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner is not turned up for adducing evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.Vasantha
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V.Rajesh
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.S.Vikraman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.Dinesh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Govind.V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Midhun. A.Satheesh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Syamkrishnan.K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Goutham.S.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.V.S.Sunilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Elizabath Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent and did not adduce evidence.
Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sajitha.G.M vs Sreedevi.C regarding Rent Control.
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Sukumari.S vs Sahinsha regarding Rent Control
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Shajan.A vs Naufal.T regarding Rent Control
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Prabha Sekhar vs Chinnu Ajith Alias Gracey Ajith Kumar regarding rent control dispute
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Abdul Kalam Azad vs Shamla Beevi regarding Rent Control
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Defendant Won