Case Summary
Petition to evict respondent from a property due to unauthorized alterations diminishing its value and utility, enabling petitioners' family to start a new business.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of the property and costs awarded to petitioner
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to vacate the property within 2 months and pay all costs to the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Awaiting document quality assessment
Judgment Evidence:
In the result petition is allowed as follows. I. Directing the respondent herein to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the petitioner within 2 months from the date of this order under 11(3) and 11(4) (ii) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent control )Act 1965. II. The respondent is directed to pay the entire costs of the petition to the petitioner.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kuttiyil Pathummakutty
- Party Age
- 83
- Relation
- W/o Mangala
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Farooq
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o Muhammedali
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aramughan
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o Thachanattu Veettil Makkunni
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Lawyer Notice, Postal Receipt, Acknowledgment Card
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Vacant possession of the property granted to the petitioner
Evidence:
In the result petition is allowed as follows. I. Directing the respondent herein to give vacant possession of the petition schedule shop room to the petitioner within 2 months from the date of this order under 11(3) and 11(4) (ii) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent control )Act 1965.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Costs awarded to the petitioner
Evidence:
In the result petition is allowed as follows. II. The respondent is directed to pay the entire costs of the petition to the petitioner.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submission of lawyer notice to the respondent
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of postal receipt submission
Reference:
A2
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of receipt
Reference:
A3
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kuttiyil Pathummakutty et al vs Aramughan regarding property alteration
Case Code Year
Case between Kuttiyil Pathummakutty et al vs Aramughan regarding property alteration