Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No. 412/2019

Case between Kunjan et al vs The State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2024-08-02
Duration
approximately-5 years
Case Code No.
412
Case Closed
Fri, 08/02/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs include Kunjan, Omana, and Mohanan among others. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs did not appear in court to present evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiffs failed to appear without sufficient reasons, resulting in the suit being dismissed for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiffs failed to appear without sufficient reasons, resulting in the suit being dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs did not appear in court as required.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs did not appear in court as required.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's did not turned up to adduce evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunjan
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Omana
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohanan
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mahesh
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chithra
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The State of Kerala
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Re-Survey Superintendent
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Tahsildar
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Village Officer
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vadavucode Puthencruz Grama Panchayat
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. M. Alias
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. V. Shiji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T. N. Arun Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Biji Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiffs' non-appearance.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Case Filed
Fri, 08/02/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 08/02/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Bijin P.R et al vs Kerala Water Authority et al regarding petition to set aside ex parte decree
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thiruvithamkoor Devaswam Board et al vs Sindhu K.P. regarding payment of court fees.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mohammed Firoz V.I vs The Deputy Chief Electrical Inspector et al regarding Balance Court Fee
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.A.Muralimohan vs State of Kerala et al regarding civil suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M N Vishwambaran vs Greater Cochin Development Authority et al regarding dismissal for default.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won