Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 79 OF 2016

Case between Kunhimarakkar.C.P. vs Vadakke Karanamvalappil Kunhumon regarding eviction

Court
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-06-29
Duration
1 year
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner seeks eviction of respondent from rented property to reconstruct the building for personal business use.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the petitioner's request for eviction to enable the reconstruction of the building for personal business use.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner's bona fide need for eviction to reconstruct the building for personal business use was proven unchallenged by the respondent.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed under section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965 as follows: The respondent is directed to provide the petitioner vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month from today. The respondent shall pay costs of the petition.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kunhimarakkar.C.P. (47 years) Chekkintepurakkal Veedu, P.O. Paravanna, Vakkad, Pachattiri amsom Paravanna desom, Tirur Taluk.

Defendants

Vadakke Karanamvalappil Kunhumon (50 years) Vadakke Karanamvalappil Veedu, P.O. Vakkad, Pachattiri amsom Paravanna desom, Azheekkal, Residing at west side of TMG College, Tirur Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month
Evidence:
The petition is allowed under section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965 as follows: The respondent is directed to provide the petitioner vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month from today. The respondent shall pay costs of the petition.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documented demands made prior to eviction request.
Reference:
A1(a)
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of respondent's response to eviction request.
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner for validation of facts.
Reference:
C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted by Advocate Commissioner for validation of facts.
Reference:
C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Thu, 06/29/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases