Case Summary
Petitioner seeks eviction of respondent from rented property for bonafide need of expanding his business. Respondent failed to vacate despite rent arrears and bonafide need proved by petitioner.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction Order
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved bonafide need for expanding business and absence of suitable alternative for the respondent.
The petitioner proved bonafide need for expanding business and absence of suitable alternative for the respondent.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition is allowed under section 11(3) of the Kerala Building Act 1965 as follows: The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month from today.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Kunhi Marakkar. C.P (47 years)
Chekkinte Purakkal Veed, Vakkad, Pachattiri amsom, Paravanna desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 502
Defendants
Blangattu Parambil Abdul Rehiman (65 years)
Blangattuparambil Pachattiri amsom, Paravanna desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 502, Near TMG College North
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Order for respondent to vacate the property within one month
Evidence:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month from today.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to respondent
Reference:
A1(a)
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of postage of notice to respondent
Reference:
A1(b)
Document Type:
Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of received notice
Reference:
A1(c)
Document Type:
Reply Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Response to petitioner's notice
Reference:
A2