ORIGINAL SUIT No.24/2017

Case between K.T.Abdul Latheef vs Kozhikode Corporation et al regarding mandatory injunction.

Court

COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I

Judge

Sri. Vivek P.

Order Date

2025-02-10

Duration

approximately-7 years

Case Closed

Mon, 02/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.T.Abdul Latheef, the plaintiff, filed a suit seeking a mandatory injunction. The defendants include Kozhikode Corporation represented by its Secretary and others.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed as withdrawn without liberty. This order was pronounced by the Principal Munsiff in open court.

Why Plaintiff Won:

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Allowed. Hence OS 24/17 and 25/17 are dismissed as withdrawn without liberty.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: K.T.Abdul Latheef
Party Age: 53
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kozhikode Corporation
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Tony Mathew
Party Age: 55
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: S.G.Venkidachalam
Party Age: 60
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Adv. K.M.Musthafa
Party Age: 54
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.Prasanth.U
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.E.Asokan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.P.N.Sreenivasan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Smt.V.G.Neena
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Withdrawal of the original suit

Evidence:

IA 20/25 filed to withdraw the OS 24/17 and O.S.25/17. Allowed. Hence OS 24/17 and 25/17 are dismissed as withdrawn without liberty.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification