Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 67/2023

Case between Kozhikode Gandhi Peace Foundation Trust vs K Asokan regarding eviction of tenants

Court
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.Meera John K
Order Date
2025-07-26
Duration
approximately-2 years 8 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kozhikode Gandhi Peace Foundation Trust filed a petition seeking eviction of K Asokan and K Asokan on grounds of unauthorized subleasing and bona fide need for property. The petition alleges that the respondents subleased the property and violated terms of the lease agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition for eviction was allowed in part, with the court ordering the respondents to vacate the petition schedule property within one month. However, the eviction under two provisions was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondents under Section 11(4)(i) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition for eviction was allowed in part, with the court ordering the respondents to vacate the petition schedule property within one month. However, the eviction under two provisions was dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the petitioner established the need to reclaim possession for bona fide purposes.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the petitioner established the need to reclaim possession for bona fide purposes.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner intends to start a vocational training programme for unemployed women. Hence, it is required to reclaim the petition schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed in part as follows. Eviction of the respondents under Section 11(3) and 11(4)(ii) are dismissed. Eviction of the respondents is allowed under Section 11(4)(i) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C Krishnan Moosad
Party Age
97
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K Asokan
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K Asokan
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent agreement, lawyer notices, government orders, minutes of meetings.
Defendants Documents
Paper publication, applications, replies to letters.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Harish
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.NT Anjana
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.PC Padmaja
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondents from the petition schedule property on the grounds specified under Section 11(4)(i) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Evidence:
Eviction of the respondents under Section 11(3) and 11(4)(ii) are dismissed.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The request for eviction based on other grounds was refused.
Evidence:
Eviction of the respondents under Section 11(3) and 11(4)(ii) are dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document outlines the rental agreement between the petitioner and the first respondent for the lease of the petition schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A notice sent by the petitioner to the respondents regarding their need for eviction.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Paper publication
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
A newspaper advertisement by the respondents indicating available rental properties.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The report prepared by the advocate commissioner regarding the condition of the petition schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The plan submitted along with the commission report illustrating the layout of the petition schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Kozhikode Gandhi Peace Foundation Trust vs K Asokan regarding eviction of tenants
Case Code Year
Case between Kozhikode Gandhi Peace Foundation Trust vs K Asokan regarding eviction of tenants

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Wed, 09/13/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Gandhi Peace Foundation

Similar Cases

Case between K. V. Santhosh Kumar vs K.K. Sivarajan regarding eviction of tenant.
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between C.Vasu vs Jobish.C regarding eviction from rented property
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER /PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kakkuzhiyil Sainabi vs Kottakkal Muhammed Koya et al regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Shoukkathali et al vs Smt.Sumathi regarding eviction under Rent Control Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between O.K.Lasitha vs Janakiyamma.P.P regarding eviction under KBLR Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won