Case Summary
The petition was filed by minors represented by their mother against the respondents. The counsel for the petitioner reported not having instructions from clients, resulting in dismissal of the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Name of petitioners called. They are absent. Hence the petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Koulath-P1 (0 years)
Tirurangadi Amsom, Desom, Post and Taluk
Sahad Afreedi-minor-P2 (Age not specified years)
Tirurangadi Amsom, Desom, Post and Taluk
Ayisha Hanona-minor (Age not specified years)
Tirurangadi Amsom, Desom, Post and Taluk
Fathima Visna-minor-P4 (Age not specified years)
Tirurangadi Amsom, Desom, Post and Taluk
Defendants
Akbar Ali-R1 (0 years)
Tirurangadi Amsom, Desom, Post and Taluk
Faseela-R2 (20 years)
Tirurangadi Amsom, Desom, Post and Taluk
Riyaz Muhammed-R3 (24 years)
Kottakkal Amsom, Desom and Post, Tirur Talu
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Unknown
Evidence: