Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 386 OF 20 16

Case between Khamarulaila et al vs Shajudheen et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-12-14
Duration
1 year, 11 months, 21 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Three plaintiffs filed suit seeking injunction against two defendants in the Court of the Munsiff of Tirur.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was dismissed with costs as the counsel for the plaintiff reported no instructions.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Injunction - dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for injunction. The counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. Hence suit is dismissed with cost.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Khamarulaila (48 years) Thrikanapuram amsom, Vattekkad desom, Ponnani Taluk Ramla (46 years) Thrikanapuram amsom, Vattekkad desom, Ponnani Taluk Rasiya (42 years) Parappara House, Thrikanapuram amsom, Vattekkad desom, Ponnani Taluk

Defendants

Shajudheen (Age not specified years) Pottayil Vakayil House, Kazhathallur, Pallippadi, Kuttipuram Post, Tirur Taluk Noushad Babu (38 years) Ulliri thodi House, Karekkad amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit for injunction dismissed with cost.
Evidence:
Suit for injunction. The counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. Hence suit is dismissed with cost.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases