Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 357/2022

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sri.Dinesh Kumar regarding dismissal of execution petition.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Judge
Smt. Meera John K
Order Date
2025-12-17
Duration
Case Code No.
357
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Kerala Gramin Bank as the petitioner and Sri.Dinesh Kumar as the respondent regarding an execution petition. The court dismissed the petition for default due to non-production of required documents.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's failure to produce necessary documents.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's failure to produce necessary documents.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the petitioner failed to produce the required Encumbrance Certificate, Valuation Certificate, and Draft Sale Proclamation.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the petitioner failed to produce the required Encumbrance Certificate, Valuation Certificate, and Draft Sale Proclamation.
Supporting Evidence
Inspite of chances given, Encumbrance Certificate, Valuation Certificate and Draft Sale Proclamation are not produced.

Judgment Evidence:

EP is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri.Dinesh Kumar
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Encumbrance Certificate, Valuation Certificate, Draft Sale Proclamation.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sri.Sanil Chandran KV
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Smt.Harsha KS
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Petitioner
Relevance:
Not produced in court despite chances given.
Reference:
Document Type: Valuation certificate
Submitted By: Petitioner
Relevance:
Not produced in court despite chances given.
Reference:
Document Type: Draft Sale Proclamation
Submitted By: Petitioner
Relevance:
Not produced in court despite chances given.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
KOZHIKODE
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kuruvattoor Service Co-Operative Bank vs Jabir PT regarding dismissal of execution petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between General Manager vs Mahasil Kundalangadan regarding EP proceedings.
Court of the Principal Munsiff – I, Kozhikode
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Ratheesan regarding EP dismissal.
Court of the Principal Munsiff – I
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Smt.Mirash V regarding balance amount and sale confirmation.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Shylaja M et al regarding settlement of decree.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won