Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P. 319 / 2023 in O.S.68/2018

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Abdul Razak et al regarding dismissal of execution petition.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Sri.Vivek.P
Order Date
2025-01-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank is the petitioner represented by Mr. Jayaraj. The respondents include Abdul Razak, Janaki, Prabhija, and Karthika (a minor). The court dismissed the execution petition due to the decree holder's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was dismissed due to the absence of the decree holder during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed due to the absence of the decree holder during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder was absent and not ready for enquiry.
Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder was absent and not ready for enquiry.
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder absent. Not ready for enquiry.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence EP dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Razak
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Janaki
Party Age
71
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prabhija
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Karthika-(Minor)
Party Age
7
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr.Jayaraj
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Geetharani
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Umesh Kumar.A.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The execution petition was dismissed for default due to the decree holder being absent.
Evidence:
Decree Holder absent. Not ready for enquiry. Judgment debtor represented. Hence EP dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Abdul Razak et al regarding dismissal of execution petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Abdul Razak et al regarding dismissal of execution petition.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Mani KK regarding execution petition.
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Linsiya AL et al regarding Execution Petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Shantha et al regarding execution petition.
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Praseena VP regarding execution petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mr.Santhosh.V regarding execution petition.
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Defendant Won