Case Summary
Petitioners seek eviction of respondent from a room they own to start a hotel business due to bonafide need.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction and costs
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner's bonafide need for the room was established as the respondent did not challenge the evidence provided by the petitioners.
The petitioner's bonafide need for the room was established as the respondent did not challenge the evidence provided by the petitioners.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition is allowed under section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Karimbanakkal Kunhimoideenkkutty's children (Age not specified years)
Iringavoor amsom, Vaniyannur desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Valliyengal Sidheek (53 years)
Iringavoor amsom, desom, Tirur taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Vacant possession of the room within one month
Evidence:
The petition is allowed under section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Respondent to pay costs of the petition
Evidence:
None