Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 95 OF 2014

Case between Kadalayi Hussain et al vs Sabna regarding mandatory injunction and damages

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju V.G.
Order Date
2015-04-07
Duration
Less than a year
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction to vacate property from defendant and claim damages for unauthorized occupation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiffs granted mandatory injunction for defendant to vacate the property and to pay damages for unauthorized occupation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Mandatory injunction to vacate property and damages for use and occupation
Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction and Damages
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendant is directed by a mandatory injunction to vacate plaint schedule property within one month from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kadalayi Hussain (59 years) Not mentioned Bushra (43 years) Not mentioned Ahammed Kabeer (24 years) Valavannur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Sabna (30 years) Tirur amsom, Kott desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to vacate the property within one month.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendant is directed by a mandatory injunction to vacate plaint schedule property within one month from today.
Relief Type: Damages for Use and Occupation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs entitled to Rs. 1,250 per month from defendant for unauthorized occupation.
Evidence:
Since the licence is legally revoked, the occupation of the plaint schedule property by the defendant after the termination of the licence is unauthorised.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves issuance of notice to defendant.
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of notice receipt from defendant.
Reference:
A2
Document Type: License Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of license agreement between previous owner and defendant.
Reference:
A3

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Mon, 04/07/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases