Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 102/2025

Case between Joy. J vs Shylaja regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P
Order Date
2025-03-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Joy. J and Ajina V. S are the plaintiffs seeking an injunction against Shylaja and Lailaja. The court found that granting an injunction was necessary to prevent irreparable injury to the petitioners.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiffs as it found that a prima facie case existed. The defendants were restrained from alienating the petition schedule property until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction against the defendants
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiffs as it found that a prima facie case existed. The defendants were restrained from alienating the petition schedule property until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found a prima facie case and the need to prevent irreparable injury to the petitioners.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found a prima facie case and the need to prevent irreparable injury to the petitioners.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondents are restrained from alienating the petition schedule property until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joy. J
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajina. V. S
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shylaja
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lailaja
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Plaint, affidavit and documents produced.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Vellalloor. V. Jayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction restraining the respondents from alienating the petition schedule property until further order.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioners. Hence the respondents are restrained from alienating the petition schedule property until further order.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Joy. J vs Shylaja regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Joy. J vs Shylaja regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won