Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact
O.S No. 135/2022

Case between Jose G.P vs Mr. Arun et al regarding dismissal of suit for default.

Court
COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-01-10
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Jose G.P as the plaintiff and defendants Mr. Arun and Mr. Kunjukunju. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of both parties. No proof affidavit was filed by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not submit proof affidavit.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jose G.P (52 years years) G.P.Traders, K.K. Road, 64/3162, Kathrikkadavu, Kaloor, Kochi- 682 017 residing at Gnjalian House, Neeliswarayam P.O, Kalambattupuram Desom, Kalady village, Aluva Taluk, Ernakulam Dist – 683 574.

Defendants

Mr. Arun (38 years years) Laly Opticals and Eye clinic, K.K.Road, Kathrikkadavu, Kaloor, Kochi – 682 017. Mr.Kunjukunju (68 years years) Laly Opticals and EyeClinic, Kathrikkadavu, Kaloor, Kochi- 682 017.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases