Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP.No 40/2008 IN OS No. 21//2006

Case between Jayalal vs Jayasree et al regarding execution of decree.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND.P
Order Date
2025-12-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jayalal, the decree holder, represented by Soudamini filed an execution petition against the judgment debtors including Jayasree, Kamalamma, Subhash Chandra Bose, and Soman for the execution of a decree. The court closed the execution petition after recording full satisfaction of the decree.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was closed after the court acknowledged that the boundary wall construction was completed and full satisfaction of the decree was recorded.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was closed after the court acknowledged that the boundary wall construction was completed and full satisfaction of the decree was recorded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The execution petition was successfully recorded as fully satisfied by the construction completion.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The execution petition was successfully recorded as fully satisfied by the construction completion.
Supporting Evidence
The information stated that the boundary wall construction completed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence execution petition is closed after recording full satisfaction.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayalal
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayasree
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kamalamma
Party Age
68
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subhash Chandra Bose
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Soman
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Vimal Chandran. R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Thajudheen Ahammed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V.S. Pradeep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jayalal vs Jayasree et al regarding execution of decree.
Case Code Year
Case between Jayalal vs Jayasree et al regarding execution of decree.

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank, Kadakkavoor Branch vs Mani. C., @ Mani Achari et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sameer. S et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank, Varkala Branch vs Jeevanlal et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Bindhu regarding execution petition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Udha vs Chandramgathan et al regarding execution of decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won