Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.205/2022

Case between Jayakumar. V vs Kerala State Paultry Development Corporation Limited regarding abatement of suit.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-10-09
Duration
Case Code No.
205
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Jayakumar. V, was absent and had passed away, with no legal representatives impleaded in his place. Consequently, the court ruled that the suit stands abated as per the Code of Civil Procedure.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court determined that the suit cannot proceed due to the plaintiff's death and lack of action to appoint legal representatives.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court determined that the suit cannot proceed due to the plaintiff's death and lack of action to appoint legal representatives.
Key Reasoning:
The suit stands abated due to the absence of necessary legal representation for the deceased plaintiff.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit stands abated due to the absence of necessary legal representation for the deceased plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel for the defendant submitted that, so far no steps are taken to implead Legal Representatives of deceased plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit stands abated under Order XXII Rule (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayakumar. V
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kerala State Paultry Development Corporation Limited
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Harilal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.A. Abdul Kharim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Sajad Kharim
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Vaishnavi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Shadil Shabeer, Nizam Mohammed vs Kesavadasapuram Muslim Jama Ath et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Chakkacheril Rubbers Pvt.Ltd vs Nilambur Traders regarding dismissal of suit.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Anil kumar et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mithun John Mathew vs Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala regarding mediation agreement.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won