Case Summary
Jayakrishnan is the decree holder in this execution petition, while K. Vasudevan is the judgment debtor. The court has issued a stay order on the execution petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The stay order on the execution petition has been issued by the court. The decree holder has the option to revive the execution petition when the stay is vacated.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court acknowledged the stay order that was produced.
The court acknowledged the stay order that was produced.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court acknowledged the stay order that was produced.
The court acknowledged the stay order that was produced.
Supporting Evidence
The court acknowledged the stay order that was produced.
Judgment Evidence:
Stay order produced. EP closed for the time being. Decree holder can revive EP as and when stay is vacated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayakrishnan
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K. Vasudevan
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Stay order
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A.K. Sukumaran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Simon Chacko
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Stay order passed, EP closed for the time being.
Evidence:
Stay order produced. EP closed for the time being. Decree holder can revive EP as and when stay is vacated.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jayakrishnan vs K. Vasudevan regarding execution petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Jayakrishnan vs K. Vasudevan regarding execution petition.