Case Summary
The case involves a review petition filed by the defendant, Sabeena, against the plaintiffs Janardhanan Nair and Gopakumar. The court allowed the petition to review an earlier order, enabling the defendant to present additional evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the review petition which means the defendant can now present additional evidence that was previously not considered.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the petition is allowed and order in I.A. 4/2023, dated. 27.03.2023 is reviewed and the proposed document is accepted.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Janardhanan Nair
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gopakumar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sabeena
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Merly. G.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Ramesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed and the proposed document is accepted.
Evidence:
this court is of the view that the petition can be allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
The court recognized the need for the petitioner to adduce evidence regarding the proposed document.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Janardhanan Nair et al vs Sabeena regarding review petition
Case Code Year
Case between Janardhanan Nair et al vs Sabeena regarding review petition