Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
Restor.P 2266/2017

Case between Jameela vs Hajiyaray Purakkal Ubaid regarding restoration petition

Court
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Sri. Sanu C
Order Date
2017-12-14
Duration
0 years, 3 months, 22 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner Jameela filed a restoration petition against respondent Hajiyaray Purakkal Ubaid, seeking to allow the restoration petition on payment of costs.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the restoration petition on payment of costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of petition on payment of costs
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

IA is dismissed. Heard both counsel, since it is a restoration petition of the restoration petition. I am inclined to allow it on terms of Rs.1500/-.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Jameela (60 years) Post Koottay, Managalam amsom, Koottay desom.

Defendants

Hajiyaray Purakkal Ubaid (0 years) Post koottay, Mangalam amsom, Kootay desom.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Restoration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restoration petition allowed on payment of costs
Evidence:
IA is dismissed. Heard both counsel, since it is a restoration petition of the restoration petition. I am inclined to allow it on terms of Rs.1500/-.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
Case Filed
Wed, 08/23/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases