Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.327/2025

Case between Indulekha M B et al vs Muralidharan M B regarding temporary Injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-03-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Indulekha M B and others, filed a petition for a temporary injunction against the respondent, Muralidharan M B. The court found that the petitioners established a prima facie case, warranting the grant of an interim injunction to prevent harm to their property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a temporary injunction to the petitioners, prohibiting the respondent from demolishing a boundary wall and taking further actions detrimental to their property until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction restraining the respondent from demolishing the boundary wall and constructing any gate.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction to the petitioners, prohibiting the respondent from demolishing a boundary wall and taking further actions detrimental to their property until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners established a prima facie case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners established a prima facie case.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioners have made out a prima facie case and if order of temporary injunction is not granted, irreparable injury is likely to be caused to the petitioners.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondent and his men, agents from demolishing the boundary wall separating the plaint schedule property and the property of the respondent or from constructing any gate for accessing the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Indulekha M B
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chitralekha M B
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Santhosh Kumar K R
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Preethy P Nair
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajesh Kumar K
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muralidharan M B
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreejith S Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
This Petition has been come up for hearing for temporary injunction.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the petitioners have made out a prima facie case and if order of temporary injunction is not granted, irreparable injury is likely to be caused to the petitioners.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Indulekha M B et al vs Muralidharan M B regarding temporary Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Indulekha M B et al vs Muralidharan M B regarding temporary Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Santharam et al vs R. Ramesh et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between V. N Ranganathan vs Sajeevan et al regarding injunction and consequential relief
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Jose John vs Golden Metro Apartment Owners Association et al regarding violations of association bylaws and waste collection
MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between K.S. Vinod vs Dr. S. Satish Bhat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Shyju Antony vs The Apostolic Administrator et al regarding appointments of Chancellor & Finance Officer
The Court of the Munsiff, Ernakulam
Injunction Defendant Won