Case Summary
Hashim Thangal is the plaintiff in this case against M/s. HDFC Bank Limited and its executives. The suit was not pressed and was dismissed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not press the suit.
The plaintiff did not press the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not press the suit.
The plaintiff did not press the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was not pressed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Hashim Thangal
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. HDFC Bank Limited
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Managing Director, M/s. HDFC Bank Limited
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manager Branch in Charge, M/s. HDFC Bank Limited
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manager (Vehicle Loans), M/s. HDFC Bank Limited
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nirmal Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- E. Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Bijesh K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit not pressed
Evidence:
Suit not pressed. Hence dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Hashim Thangal vs M/s. HDFC Bank Limited et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Hashim Thangal vs M/s. HDFC Bank Limited et al regarding dismissal of suit.