Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RCP.No.115/2024

Case between Harihara Suthan et al vs S.Ayyan Perumal regarding arrears of rent

Court
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-09-10
Duration
approximately-1 year 9 months
Case Code No.
115
Case Closed
Wed, 09/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Harihara Suthan and Rajeshwari Suthan, filed a Rent Control Petition against S.Ayyan Perumal for the recovery of arrears of rent. The court determined the respondent owed a significant amount of rent, which was not fully paid.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, allowing the Rent Control Petition and directing the respondent to pay the outstanding arrears of rent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Payment of arrears of rent Rs. 9,96,450/-
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, allowing the Rent Control Petition and directing the respondent to pay the outstanding arrears of rent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent admitted the landlord-tenant relationship and the existence of arrears, failing to provide any evidence to dispute the claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent admitted the landlord-tenant relationship and the existence of arrears, failing to provide any evidence to dispute the claims.
Supporting Evidence
I am of the view that as the respondent is admitting the title of the petitioners, landlord-tenant relationship, existence of tenancy, the rate of rent, the terms Exhibits A2 and A3 agreements and the respondent has not produced any rent receipts or any details of any payment for the period of default claimed by the petitioners.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed with costs directing the respondent to pay arrears of rent Rs. 9,96,450/- (Rupees Nine lakhs Ninety Six thousand Four hundred and Fifty only) for the period from November 2023 till August 2025 within one month from the date of this order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Harihara Suthan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajeshwari Suthan
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S.Ayyan Perumal
Plaintiffs Documents
Exhibits A1 to A9 including Leave and License agreements and Medical Reports.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G.Harikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.S.Vineeth Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioners claim for arrears of rent.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed with costs directing the respondent to pay arrears of rent Rs. 9,96,450/- (Rupees Nine lakhs Ninety Six thousand Four hundred and Fifty only) for the period from November 2023 till August 2025 within one month from the date of this order.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Continued payment of rent amount.
Evidence:
The respondent shall continue to pay the rent amount of Rs.45,000/- per month which may subsequently become due in respect of the building until the termination of the proceedings before this court.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Special Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the petitioners in favour of their son.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Leave and License Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement dated 14.12.2023 regarding accommodation for the respondent's mother.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Leave and License Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement dated 15.12.2023 regarding a jewelry business.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Medical Reports
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reports of the first petitioner relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A4 series
Document Type: Academic Qualification Certificates
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificates of the first petitioner relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A5 series
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice dated 04.09.2024 served to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Two postal receipts relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A7 series
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Card acknowledging receipt of documentation.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of accounts of the second petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
RCP.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 09/10/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between James Fletcher vs Ramakrishnan Ravi regarding eviction
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Trivandrum Ex-Servicemen Automobile Engineering & Transport Industrial Co-operative Society Ltd. vs M/s. Redcherry Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding eviction of tenant
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr.S.Krishna Kumar vs Manoj regarding eviction proceedings
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Renuka Vijayan vs T.N Chinnappan regarding eviction for non-payment of rent.
Court of Rent Control
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Debu Raju vs Saritha Suresh regarding arrears of rent
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won