Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO.93 OF 2015

Case between Hamza et al vs Balakrishnan et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.,B.A LL.B.
Order Date
2017-04-07
Duration
1 year 11 months 16 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs comprising Hamza, Fathima, Nafeesa represented by power of attorney holder Kanakkayil Abdul Razak, filed a suit against defendants Balakrishnan, Velayudhan, Janaki, Narayani, and Dhakshayani seeking injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was dismissed as per the terms of a lawful compromise agreement.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of suit
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for injunction. IA. 1008/2016 allowed. Since the terms of compromise is lawful, the suit is dismissed as per the terms of compromise. Compromise shall form part of decree. Suit is dismissed as no costs. (Pronounced by me in open court, this, the 7ᵗʰ day of April, 2017) sd/- MUNSIFF.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Hamza (53 years) Melmuri amsom, desom, Post Kadambuzha, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 553 Fathima (49 years) Melmuri amsom, desom, Post Kadambuzha, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 553 Nafeesa (37 years) Melmuri amsom, desom, Post Kadambuzha, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 676 553

Defendants

Balakrishnan (60 years) Vadakkumbram amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 679 339 Velayudhan (45 years) Vadakkumbram amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 679 339 Janaki (57 years) Vadakkumbram amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 679 339 Narayani (55 years) Vadakkumbram amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 679 339 Dhakshayani (52 years) Vadakkumbram amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, Pin: 679 339

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissal of suit
Description:
To prevent obstruction or disturbance by defendants
Evidence:
Suit for injunction. IA. 1008/2016 allowed. Since the terms of compromise is lawful, the suit is dismissed as per the terms of compromise. Compromise shall form part of decree. Suit is dismissed as no costs.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Tue, 04/07/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
89%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases