Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1880/2018

Case between Federation of Residents Associations, Thiruvananthapuram vs P.Satheesh Kumar, K Sugunan, Manoharan Nair regarding declaration and injunction.

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff - I
Judge
Smt. Karthika.A.R
Order Date
2025-03-26
Duration
approximately-6 years 11 months
Case Closed
Wed, 03/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit filed by the Federation of Residents Associations against three defendants for a declaration of elected office bearers and injunction against the defendants. The defendants were accused of attempting to represent the society without legal authority.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiffs' elected office bearers for the period of 2017 are legally recognized and allowed the plaintiffs to recover costs from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Declaration of elected office bearers and costs recovery.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiffs' elected office bearers for the period of 2017 are legally recognized and allowed the plaintiffs to recover costs from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established its case through uncontroverted testimony and documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established its case through uncontroverted testimony and documentary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontroverted testimony of PW1 and Ext.A1 to A12 documents, the plaintiff had established his case warranting the grant of relief sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit decreed with costs as follows: 1. It is hereby declared that the office bearers mentioned in the plaint A schedule as the legally elected office bearers of the plaintiff society for the period 2017. 2. The plaintiff is allowed to realize the cost of the suit from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Federation of Residents Associations, Thiruvananthapuram
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pattom Sasidharan Nair
Party Age
76
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.Satheesh Kumar
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K Sugunan
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manoharan Nair
Party Age
72
Plaintiffs Documents
Registration Certificate No. T 50/1993, Copy of Bye Law of the Plaintiff Society, Extracts of Minutes of the Meeting, Letters sent to the defendants, Photocopy of Voters List 2017, and Newspaper Articles.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C Sasidharan Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration of the office bearers mentioned in the plaint as the legally elected office bearers for the specified period.
Evidence:
It is hereby declared that the office bearers mentioned in the plaint A schedule as the legally elected office bearers of the plaintiff society for the period 2017.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize the cost of the suit from the defendants and their assets.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is allowed to realize the cost of the suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the legal registration of the plaintiff society.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: By Law of the Plaintiff Society
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides the governing rules of the plaintiff society.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Extract of the Minutes of the Meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documented proof of the proceedings and decisions taken during general body meetings.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Extract of the Minutes of the Meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further documentation of the decisions taken in the society's meetings.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Communication sent to the first defendant regarding society matters.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another correspondence to the first defendant to address issues.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Photocopy of the Voters List
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
List for verifying eligible voters in the society elections.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Newspaper Article
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Public announcement related to society activities.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Newspaper Article
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another public announcement concerning the society.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Photocopy of Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice relevant to society membership and meeting.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Extract of the Minutes of the Meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Minutes documenting decisions from a specific meeting.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Attendance Register
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Record of attendance for the Annual General Body Meeting.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Internal disputes within the association
Case Code
Case between Federation of Residents Associations, Thiruvananthapuram vs P.Satheesh Kumar, K Sugunan, Manoharan Nair regarding declaration and injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Federation of Residents Associations, Thiruvananthapuram vs P.Satheesh Kumar, K Sugunan, Manoharan Nair regarding declaration and injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 03/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Charitable Society

Similar Cases

Case between Swathi Thirunal Saraswathy Mandaapam Charitable Society vs Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram et al regarding suit dismissal for default
I st ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Eljove.C. Chummar vs M/S Kunnamkulam Charitable Society et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V.C.Babu vs Mithram et al regarding ad-interim injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Catholic Truth Charitable Society et al vs Major Arch Diocese of Ernakulam Angamaly et al regarding dismissal for default.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Electrical Wiremen and Supervisors Association Welfare Fund Society et al vs Ajithkumar G et al regarding interim injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won