Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.21 OF 2016

Case between Fathima et al vs Abdul Hakeem regarding eviction and license fee arrears

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-06-30
Duration
11 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners seek eviction of respondent due to license fee arrears and plan to start a Mini Super Market on the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petitioners are granted an order for eviction and possession of the property within one month, pending deposit of arrears by the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction and vacant possession
Case Type
Eviction - Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners are entitled to eviction due to arrears of rent and bonafide need to start a Mini Super Market as the respondent failed to pay license fee.

Judgment Evidence:

The petitioners are entitled for an order u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act. In the result, the petition is allowed under section 11(2) (b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965. a) The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Fathima (51 years) Ponmumdam amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Muhammed Afeekh (33 years) Ponmumdam amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Ashikh (21 years) Ponmumdam amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Hamna (16 years) Ponmumdam amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Abdul Hakeem.P (47 years) Poklath House, Thanaloor amsom, desom, Post Meenadathoor, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction and vacant possession
Evidence:
The petitioners are entitled for an order u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act. In the result, the petition is allowed under section 11(2) (b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965. The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month from today.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Registered Lawyer notice with postal receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sent to revoke license due to arrears of rent
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Received in response to the revocation of license
Reference:
A3

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Fri, 07/08/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases