Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
IN ORIGINAL SUIT No. 89 OF 2017

Case between Dr.Krtty's Health Care et al vs Kariyil Surendran et al regarding Setting aside exparte decree

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-12-19
Duration
1 year

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Case involves Dr.Krtty's Health Care as petitioner and Kariyil Surendran et al as respondents in an application to set aside an exparte decree dated 31-10-2018.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Experte decree of 31-10-2018 set aside with petitioner to deposit cost by 21-12-2019.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Exparte decree set aside on deposit of cost of ₹3,000/- (Rupees Three thousand only) on or before 21-12-2019.
Case Type
Interlocutory Application in Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The exparte decree was set aside in the interest of justice to adjudicate the real dispute between the parties.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed and the exparte decree passed agaisnt the petitioner, dated 31-10-2018 is set aside on deposit of cost of ₹3,000/- (Rupees Three thousand only) on or before 21-12-2019.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Dr.Krtty's Health Care (Age not specified years) 2/465 Saleema Hospital Complex, P.O.Thalakkadathur.

Defendants

Kariyil Surendran (Age not specified years) Kariyil House, Ariyallur amsom desom & Post, Tirur Taluk, 676 312. Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt) Ltd. (Age not specified years) Tanur amsom desom, Pariyapuram, Mukkola, Tirur Taluk. Abdul Gafoor (Age not specified years) Kalambakkalakath Niramaruthoor amsom, desom & P.O., Tirur Taluk. Gopalakrishnan (Age not specified years) 8/201, Mankulangara Variyam, Ramapuram.P.O., Perinthalmanna Taluk.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
TIRUR
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Company

Similar Cases