Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RCP 05/2021

Case between Dr.Bhavudheen Nadvi vs K Mujeeb Rahman et al regarding restoration of RCP.

Court
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER/ PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Judge
Smt.Meera John K
Order Date
2025-06-17
Duration
approximately-2 years 5 months
Case Code No.
05
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dr.Bhavudheen Nadvi filed a petition to restore RCP 5/21 after being unable to appear for trial due to health issues. The respondents objected, claiming the reason was not valid.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed, granting the petitioner a chance to contest the case after paying costs to the respondents.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of RCP on payment of costs of Rs. 3000/-
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed, granting the petitioner a chance to contest the case after paying costs to the respondents.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner provided sufficient cause for his non-appearance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner provided sufficient cause for his non-appearance.
Supporting Evidence
I have perused the records. I am satisfied that the petitioner could bring out a sufficient cause for his non-appearance on the day of trial.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, I am of the view that a chance could be given to the petitioner to contest his case. Hence, this petition is allowed on payment of costs of Rs. 3000/- to respondent No. 2 on or before 24.06.2025 failing which the petition stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr.Bhavudheen Nadvi
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K Mujeeb Rahman
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K Sajeer Arafath
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sri. KM Musthafa
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Sri P Krishna Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restoration of the RCP to file.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the petitioner could bring out a sufficient cause for his non appearance on the day of trial. Hence, I am of the view that a chance could be given to the petitioner to contest his case.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
RCP
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
KOZHIKODE
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs Ramesh Sait regarding Rent Control Petition
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between M.K. Bushara vs Devadas P. regarding Rent Control Petition
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheela vs The Chevayur Service Co operative Bank Ltd regarding rent control petition.
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Shoukath Ali et al vs Sunandakumari et al regarding Rent Control Petition
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Nanditha Sreekumar vs Nadira Bhanu K. regarding rent control petition
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won