Case Summary
The case involves Dr. V. Sukumaran and others as petitioners against Ayoob.M.S, concerning a petition for rent control. The petition was ultimately dismissed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner was absent and no chief affidavit was filed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dr. V. Sukumaran
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- Power of Attorney Holder of his son
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Leela Sukumaran
- Party Age
- 72
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dr. S. Hari Govind
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- through Power of Attorney
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ayoob.M.S
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o. Mannil Abdulla
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Ajakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sidharth Menon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Ravi Kumar P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Joshi.Y.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Fathahudeen.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Ali Nafiyudeen.A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2022