Case Summary
Dhanya Suresh filed a suit against P.D.Ravi seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction to prevent him from trespassing onto her properties. The dispute arose over the ownership and unauthorized actions taken by the defendant on the plaintiff's property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into plaint schedule properties and committing acts of waste therein.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a perpetual prohibitory injunction against the defendant, preventing him and his men from trespassing on the plaintiff's property. The plaintiff was also awarded costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 coupled with Exts.A1 to A12 would prove the case of the plaintiff.
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 coupled with Exts.A1 to A12 would prove the case of the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 coupled with Exts.A1 to A12 would prove the case of the plaintiff.
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 coupled with Exts.A1 to A12 would prove the case of the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 coupled with Exts.A1 to A12 would prove the case of the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decree are as follows:- The defendant and his men are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into plaint schedule properties and from committing acts of wastes therein and from reducing any portion of the same.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dhanya Suresh
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.D.Ravi
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Janmam Assignment deed no.1272/1981, Certified copy of Janmam Assignment deed no.1309/1981, Certified copy of Janmam Assignment deed no.952/1986, Certified copy of Janmam Assignment deed no.1063/1988, Certified copy of settlement Deed No.166/2006, Photocopy of plan issued by Village office Kozhikode, Certified copy of Decree in OS No.41/2005, Certified copy of Judgment in OS No.41/2005, Certified copy of Order in Final Decree I.A 2692/2008 in OS No.41/2005, Certified copy of plan submitted by Surveyor in Final Decree.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.K.Sidharthan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendant and his men are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule properties.
Evidence:
The defendant and his men are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into plaint schedule properties and from committing acts of wastes therein and from reducing any portion of the same.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Janmam Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the certified copy of the Janmam Assignment deed which establishes the plaintiff's claim over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Janmam Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the ownership transfer related to the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Janmam Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the release of property rights which are crucial for the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Janmam Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This deed is important in demonstrating the joint ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Settlement Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the assignment of property rights to the plaintiff, establishing her legal standing.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This plan issued by the Village office helps in identifying the property boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Decree
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This decree relates to the previous case filed regarding the property which is relevant to the current suit.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type:
Judgment
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This judgment provides context to the ongoing disputes regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type:
Order
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This order is part of the final decree proceedings and is related to the current dispute.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This plan submitted by the Surveyor is critical for understanding the layout of the disputed property.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This plan submitted by Advocate Commissioner’s aids in resolving boundary disputes.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type:
Order
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This order ties into the appeal proceedings and impacts the current case.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dhanya Suresh vs P.D.Ravi regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Dhanya Suresh vs P.D.Ravi regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction