Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 87 / 2024

Case between Deepa S Vijayan vs Sundaram Finance Ltd et al regarding ad-interim injunction.

Court
Court of the Munsiff Kolenchery
Judge
Smt.Sirsha N.A.
Order Date
2024-11-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Deepa S Vijayan is seeking an ad-interim injunction against Sundaram Finance Ltd and others. The court granted the injunction to prevent the defendants from further actions regarding the vehicle mentioned in the plaint.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff to prevent defendants from taking actions with the vehicle.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim exparte injunction against defendants.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff to prevent defendants from taking actions with the vehicle.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case justifying the grant of an ad-interim injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case justifying the grant of an ad-interim injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an ad-interim exparte injunction order is passed as follows: Temperately retraining the defendants and persons claiming under them from further alienation, mortgaging, destroying, changing its forms, selling, appropriating or adjusting, by change of tile by any manner, of the vehicle mentioned in the plaint A,B,C schedule items.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Deepa S Vijayan
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sundaram Finance Ltd
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Branch Manager PSN Automobiles PVT Ltd
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Managing Director, St.George Autos
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pramod, Branch Manager, Sundaram Finance Ltd
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajesh, Sales Executive, Sundaram Finance Ltd
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit and documents produced by the plaintiff.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shaji K Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad-interim exparte injunction preventing defendants from alienating, mortgaging, destroying, changing its forms, selling, appropriating or adjusting the vehicle mentioned in the plaint A,B,C schedule items.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case justifying the grant of an ad-interim injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Deepa S Vijayan vs Sundaram Finance Ltd et al regarding ad-interim injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Deepa S Vijayan vs Sundaram Finance Ltd et al regarding ad-interim injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Greenal Joseph vs Century Club regarding attachment before judgment
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Krishnamritha V vs Chairperson, College Union et al regarding publication of competition result.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhsina P S vs Nizar V H regarding temporary injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Alavikutty et al vs Ummer et al regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed vs Kulathur desom regarding injunction
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won