Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.45/2018

Case between David vs Baby, Kunjamma regarding mandatory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Judge
Smt. Sirsha N A.
Order Date
2023-07-31
Duration
approximately-5 years 1 month 16 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

David is the plaintiff who is seeking a mandatory injunction against Baby and Kunjamma, the legal heirs of his deceased brother Scaria. The plaintiff alleges that there was a mistake in the land deed regarding the property he owns and seeks to correct it through court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to execute a correction deed to rectify the resurvey number of the property in question.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants directed to execute a correction deed in favour of the plaintiff
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to execute a correction deed to rectify the resurvey number of the property in question.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented showed that the defendants were liable to correct the mistake in the property deed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented showed that the defendants were liable to correct the mistake in the property deed.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has proved his contentions in the plaint through affidavit and the evidence of the plaintiff remains unchallenged.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1.the defendant are hereby directed by way of mandatory injunction to execute a correction deed in favour of the plaintiff by correcting the resurvey as 378/1 in sale deed No.6506/1995 of SRO Puthencruz.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
David
Party Age
82
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Baby
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kunjamma
Party Age
58
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Photocopy of sale deed No. 6506/1995 of SRO Puthencruz, Photocopy of correction deed No.6506/1995 of SRO Puthencrz, Legal notice
Defendants Documents
NIL

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M/s. P T Geevarghese, K Mathew Varghese, and B Ramachandran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Exparte
Appearance Type
Case between David vs Baby, Kunjamma regarding mandatory injunction > Case advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff requested a mandatory injunction to direct defendants to execute a correction deed.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: the defendants are hereby directed by way of mandatory injunction to execute a correction deed in favour of the plaintiff by correcting the resurvey as 378/1 in sale deed No. 6506/1995 of SRO Puthencruz.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought costs to be awarded for the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is not entitled for the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of sale deed No. 6506/1995 of SRO Puthencruz, proving ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Correction Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of correction deed No.6506/1995 of SRO Puthencruz, related to the correction in property details.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice sent to the defendants to execute the correction deed.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt related to the legal notice sent.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Undelivered cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Undelivered cover indicating issues with communication to defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Re-Survey Plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Re-survey plan relevant to the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report submitted by Advocate Commissioner Ancy Lilla Lazer.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Survey plan prepared by Taluk Surveyor and submitted by Advocate Commissioner Ancy Lilla Lazer.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Correction of property deed
Case Code
Case between David vs Baby, Kunjamma regarding mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between David vs Baby, Kunjamma regarding mandatory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Case Filed
Thu, 06/07/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 01/01/2023 - 12:00
To
Sun, 12/31/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Saranya Rajesh vs Yesodha Mani @ Manju et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ammini et al vs Ajitha Sunil et al regarding partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mini vs Kunjappan et al regarding partition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Greeshma Devi vs Sudha Devi, Kristhudas regarding partition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thankappan vs Lakshmanan et al regarding partition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won