Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1840/2022

Case between D. Manoharan vs Sri Ceramics et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
Principal Munsiff Court
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-12
Duration
Case Code No.
1840
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

D. Manoharan filed a suit against Sri Ceramics and its Managing Partner S. Narendra. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not pursue the case further, leading to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not pursue the case further, leading to dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff filed a not press memo, resulting in a dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
D. Manoharan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri Ceramics
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. Narendra
Relation
Managing Partner
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.N.Krishna Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Kiran P.B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Pamila M.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri..Deepak Varughese Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Geethu Susan Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. E.S. Amina Bhanu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Anas Asharaf
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Meena Sharaf
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Kavitha M.I
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Darshan. J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Shadil Shabeer, Nizam Mohammed vs Kesavadasapuram Muslim Jama Ath et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Chakkacheril Rubbers Pvt.Ltd vs Nilambur Traders regarding dismissal of suit.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Anil kumar et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mithun John Mathew vs Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala regarding mediation agreement.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won