RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 45/2020

Case between C.M. Shaharbanu vs E.V. Saleem regarding Rent Control Petition

Court

RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE

Judge

Smt. Shabeena M.

Order Date

2025-03-18

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C.M. Shaharbanu is the petitioner against E.V. Saleem and Secretary, Aali Mammed Mooppanpally Committee in a rent control dispute. The case has been dismissed with costs after final hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The court has dismissed the rent control petition with costs.

Key Reasoning:
The petition was dismissed due to lack of representation for the petitioner.

Why Defendant Won:
The petition was dismissed due to lack of representation for the petitioner.

Supporting Evidence

No representation for the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In view of the findings in I.A. 2/2025, RCP dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: C.M. Shaharbanu
Party Age: 49
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: E.V. Saleem
Party Age: 55
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Secretary, Aali Mammed Mooppanpally Committee

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. P.S. Ramalingam
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. K.M. Muhammed Iqubal
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Smt. C.V. Noorjahan
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. B.M. Shamsudhin
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The Rent Control Petition was dismissed with costs.

Evidence:

IA 2/2025 allowed (VSO). In view of the findings in I.A. 2/2025, RCP dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification