Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
EP 44/2012

Case between Chenadan Kunharu Haji et al vs Variyathu Padmanabhan et al regarding delivery of property

Court
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Sri. Biju.V.G
Order Date
2014-07-21
Duration
2 years, 5 months, 29 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Chenadan Kunharu Haji and others filed a petition seeking delivery of property from Variyathu Padmanabhan and another, but the court dismissed the petition due to the property being in possession of another individual.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for delivery of property since it was reported that the property was not in the possession of the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed petition
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

No steps taken.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Chenadan Kunharu Haji (0 years) So Alavi, Kanmanam Amsom, Pothanoor Desom, Tirur Taluk Adiyattil Pathumma (Age not specified years) Kanmanam Amsom, Pothanu

Defendants

Variyathu Padmanabhan (0 years) So Pannikkod Chandrasekhara Menon, Thrikkandiyur Amsom, Desom, Tirur Taluk Koodathu Muhammedkutty Haji (0 years) So Marakkar Haji, Tanalur Amsom, Pakara Desom, Tiru

Reliefs

Relief Type: Delivery of Property
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Petition for delivery of property dismissed
Evidence:
It is reported by the Amin that the petitioner's daughter is running a super market in the petition schedule property. Since the petition schedule property is not in the possession of the respondent, the petition for delivery of property from the possession of the respondent is dismissed

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
Case Filed
Mon, 01/23/2012 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases