Case Summary
Chandralekha and others filed a review petition concerning an earlier court order in a civil suit. The case involves multiple plaintiffs and defendants regarding a property matter.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The review petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner, who failed to represent themselves despite being given ample opportunity to do so.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's continuous absence.
The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's continuous absence.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's continuous absence.
The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's continuous absence.
Supporting Evidence
Though petition was posted to the date specifically for the petitioner to appearance and submit whether he intending to proceed with the petition. Still, no representation for this petition.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Chandralekha
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- D/o. late Saradha & W/o Gopalan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gopalakrishnan
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o. Late Saradha
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vijayakumar
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o. late Saradha
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Latheswary
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- D/o. Late Saradha & W/o. Sudhakaran
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suresh Babu
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o. late Saradha
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayasree K R
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- D/o. late Saradha
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rugmini Ammal
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- W/o. late Parameswara Iyer
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Latha Sukumaran
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o. late Sukumaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sulu @ Sreepriya Sukumaran
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- D/o. late Sukumaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sulith Sukumaran
- Party Age
- 22
- Relation
- S/o. late Sukumaran
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Praisheel Prakasam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advs. Rama Kumar and M Manoj Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition is dismissed for default due to lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence, the petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Chandralekha et al vs Rugmini Ammal et al regarding review of a court order
Case Code Year
Case between Chandralekha et al vs Rugmini Ammal et al regarding review of a court order