Case Summary
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking to realize an amount due from the defendants, Ms. Rinith Parvi SV and Mr. Jamal SV. The court found that the plaintiff did not pay the required court fees, leading to the rejection of the plaint.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the required court fees.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to comply with the court fee requirements.
Plaintiff failed to comply with the court fee requirements.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to comply with the court fee requirements.
Plaintiff failed to comply with the court fee requirements.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff represented. No Balance Court Fee and Legal Benefit Fund paid.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, plaint is rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ms. Rinith Parvi SV
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Jamal SV
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Anitha K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.PT Ibrahim
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to no balance court fee and legal benefit fund paid.
Evidence:
No Balance Court Fee and Legal Benefit Fund paid. Hence, plaint is rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Ms. Rinith Parvi SV, Mr. Jamal SV regarding realisation of an amount due from defendants
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Ms. Rinith Parvi SV, Mr. Jamal SV regarding realisation of an amount due from defendants