Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 689/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Anand Mattress and Pillows regarding recovery of money

Court
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Savitha.T.P
Order Date
2025-06-27
Duration
approximately-3 years 6 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank has filed a suit for recovery of money against M/s. Anand Mattress and Pillows due to default on a loan agreement. The defendants failed to repay the sanctioned loan with interest.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants are directed to pay Rs.4,69,763/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaint claim of borrowal and default of payment stands proved by the affidavit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaint claim of borrowal and default of payment stands proved by the affidavit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint claim of borrowal and default of payment stands proved by the affidavit of PW1 and Exts.A1 to A7 documents with remains unchallenged.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendants are jointly and severally is directed to pay Rs.4,69,763/- to the plaintiff bank with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realisation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Anand Mattress and Pillows
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri.Prabeesh Kumar.K
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application put forward by Plaintiff, Letter of proprietorship, Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation, Letter of undertaking, Sanction memorandum, Statement of account from 02-12-2021 to 02-10-2023, Copy of lawyer notice, Un delivered cover, Postal receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.K.Narayanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Asokan Pazhur
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are directed to pay Rs.4,69,763/- to the plaintiff bank.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendants are jointly and severally is directed to pay Rs.4,69,763/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Sixty Nine Thousand Seven Hundred And Sixty Three Only) to the plaintiff bank with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realisation.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit.
Evidence:
2. The defendants are also directed to pay jointly and severally costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted by the defendants for loan processing.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter of Proprietorship
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the ownership of the business by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the agreement between the plaintiff and defendants regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the defendants' commitment to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the loan amount sanctioned to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the transaction history of the loan issued to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a notice sent to the defendants regarding their default.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Un delivered cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document pertains to the mail sent to the defendants regarding legal communication.
Reference:
Ext.A7(a)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of sending legal notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7(b)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Anand Mattress and Pillows regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Anand Mattress and Pillows regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Thu, 12/02/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mathew.P.J regarding recovery of money.
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Maharastra vs Sheheer.P regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs M/s.Bouchon Cakes regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The State Bank of India vs Sugil.G.S et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Karnataka Bank Limited vs Ananya.M et al regarding realisation of money
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won