Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P. 122 / 2020

Case between Canara Bank vs Mr.Faisal MT et al regarding execution petition

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Judge
Sri.Vivek.P
Order Date
2025-02-21
Duration
Case Code No.
122
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed an execution petition against Mr. Faisal MT and others regarding the tracing of the judgment debtor. The court noted the difficulties faced by the petitioner in locating the debtor and decided to close the execution petition for the time being.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was closed by the court due to the lack of representation from the petitioner and failure to trace the judgment debtor.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was closed by the court due to the lack of representation from the petitioner and failure to trace the judgment debtor.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner was unable to trace out the judgment debtor despite police assistance and multiple chances.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner was unable to trace out the judgment debtor despite police assistance and multiple chances.
Supporting Evidence
I find that petitioner had exhausted the awareness available to him in that regard.

Judgment Evidence:

I find that no purpose will be served in repeatedly issuing arrest warrant against Judgment Debtor when Decree Holder can not be traced out. Hence I am inclined to close this EP for the time being.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr.Faisal MT
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kuttiali
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by its Principal Officer/Senior Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Balachandran Cholakkad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.MC Ratnakaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Victor Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Prameela
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Rajith Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Closed
Description:
The execution petition is closed for the time being.
Evidence:
I am inclined to close this EP for the time being.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
E.P.
Case Code Year
2020

Case Flags

Arrest Involved

Quick Facts

Location
KOZHIKODE
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Mani KK regarding execution petition.
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Linsiya AL et al regarding Execution Petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Shantha et al regarding execution petition.
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Praseena VP regarding execution petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mr.Santhosh.V regarding execution petition.
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Defendant Won