Case Summary
Canara Bank is the plaintiff represented by its manager. The defendants, Chithra.M and Mariyappan, are being asked to furnish security for a stipulated amount to prevent the disposal of the petition schedule property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Conditional attachment of the petition schedule property and direction to furnish security.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court has directed the defendants to furnish security for the sum of Rs.2,40,000/- and conditionally attached the petition schedule property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff made out a prima facie case and that the defendants' actions may obstruct future enforcement.
The court found that the plaintiff made out a prima facie case and that the defendants' actions may obstruct future enforcement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the plaintiff made out a prima facie case and that the defendants' actions may obstruct future enforcement.
The court found that the plaintiff made out a prima facie case and that the defendants' actions may obstruct future enforcement.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner/ plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and I am satisfied that the counter petitioners/defendants with intent to obstruct or delay the execution of any decree that may be passed against him is about to dispose of the whole or any part of the petition schedule property.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the counter petitioners / defendants are directed either to furnish security for the sum of Rs.2,40,000/- to appear and show cause why they should not furnish security.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chithra.M
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mariyappan
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Sreena.L.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The counter petitioners/defendants are directed either to furnish security for the sum of Rs.2,40,000/- to appear and show cause why they should not furnish security.
Evidence:
the counter petitioners/defendants with intent to obstruct or delay the execution of any decree that may be passed against him is about to dispose of the whole or any part of the petition schedule property.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition schedule property is conditionally attached.
Evidence:
the petition schedule property is conditionally attached.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2025