Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 418/2024

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Nithunraj regarding recovery of loan amount

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
approximately-3 years 1 month
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking recovery of outstanding loan amounts from the defendant, Nithunraj. The case arises from the defendant's failure to repay loans sanctioned for his business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant is liable to pay the outstanding loan amounts to the plaintiff with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant shall pay Rs.5,89,156.24/- and Rs.3,51,404.65/- with interest to the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendant is liable to pay the outstanding loan amounts to the plaintiff with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the case with documentary evidence and the defendant failed to appear in court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved the case with documentary evidence and the defendant failed to appear in court.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1, supported by the documentary evidence, stands unchallenged. As such this court finds that the plaintiff has succeeded to prove his case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: A) The defendant shall pay Rs.5,89,156.24/- to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 9.55% per annum from 31.08.2024 till the date of decree. B) The defendant shall pay Rs.3,51,404.65/- to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 10.35% per annum from 16.09.2024 till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nithunraj
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sanction letter, loan agreement, various statements of account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Nikhil T.M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Anaswara N.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is ordered to pay the outstanding amounts due to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: A) The defendant shall pay Rs.5,89,156.24/- to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 9.55% per annum from 31.08.2024 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is ordered to pay another outstanding amount due to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
B) The defendant shall pay Rs.3,51,404.65/- to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 10.35% per annum from 16.09.2024 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Future interest on the awarded amounts.
Evidence:
C) The defendant shall also pay future interest at the rate of 6% p.a for the above said amount from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff entitled to costs of the suit.
Evidence:
D) The plaintiff shall also be entitled to realise the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The sanction letter issued by Canara Bank to M/S. Coaster Mens Collection evidences the loan amounts sanctioned.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the hypothecation of assets to secure the loan taken by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The letter of undertaking executed by the defendant shows the consent regarding the loan terms.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The loan agreement details the repayment terms agreed by the defendant with the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence of the outstanding balance due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another statement reflecting the defendant's account and balance.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The lawyer notice sent to the defendant is used to substantiate the demands for repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A7 Series
Document Type: Unclaimed postal cover
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
This is mentioned but does not specifically tie into any claims.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Nithunraj regarding recovery of loan amount
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Nithunraj regarding recovery of loan amount

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 05/16/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Zareena.C et al regarding realization of an amount due.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Abhinand K.R. et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Shilpa K. et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Shilpa K. et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won