Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 604/2024

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Calicut Off set Printers regarding realisation of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Savitha T.P
Order Date
2025-08-20
Duration
approximately-6 years 10 months
Case Closed
Wed, 08/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Canara Bank seeking to recover money owed by Calicut Off set Printers due to a loan default. The defendant did not appear, and the court assessed the claims based on the plaintiff's evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, ordering the defendant to repay the outstanding loan amounts to the plaintiff along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to Rs.1,93,353.06 and Rs.1,11,317.31 with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, ordering the defendant to repay the outstanding loan amounts to the plaintiff along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the debt through evidence and documentation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved the debt through evidence and documentation.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint claim of borrowal of the amount and the default of the payments is proved by the affidavit of PW1 and documents No.A1 to A14 series.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendant is directed to pay Rs.1,93,353.06... 2. The defendant is also directed to pay Rs.1,11,317.31... 3. The defendant is also directed to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Calicut Off set Printers
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Original sanction communication, Original sanction memorandum, Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation for term loan.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. K. P. Regha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Amrutha K. C.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.1,93,353.06 to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.1,93,353.06/-(One Lakhs Ninety Three Thousand Three Hundred Fifty Three and paisa Six only) to the plaintiff with an interest at the rate of 7% till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum till realisation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.1,11,317.31 to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant is also directed to pay Rs.1,11,317.31(Rupees One Lakhs Eleven Thousand Three Hundred Seventeen and Thirty one paisa) to the plaintiff interest at the rate of 7% till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum till realisation.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is also directed to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation for term loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The defendant executed this agreement agreeing to comply with the loan terms.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original sanction of communication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as proof of the loan agreement from the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Sanction memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further illustrates the details of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice to the defendant regarding the defaults.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Account statement for the period from 10-10-2018 to 17-10-2024
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the outstanding amounts on the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A13

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Calicut Off set Printers regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Calicut Off set Printers regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Wed, 10/10/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mathew.P.J regarding recovery of money.
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Maharastra vs Sheheer.P regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs M/s.Bouchon Cakes regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The State Bank of India vs Sugil.G.S et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Karnataka Bank Limited vs Ananya.M et al regarding realisation of money
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won