Case Summary
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, filed a suit against the defendants, Baby Shalu. L and Seetha T., for recovery of money. The matter was settled, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent but represented and submitted that the matter was settled. Consequently, the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and the matter was settled.
The plaintiff was absent and the matter was settled.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Submitted that matter settled.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Baby Shalu. L
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Seetha T.
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sumith Mohan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rakesh K. Rajan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Parvathy S. Pillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed
Evidence:
Submitted that matter settled. Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Baby Shalu. L, Seetha T. regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Baby Shalu. L, Seetha T. regarding recovery of money
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement