Case Summary
Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd is the petitioner, while Prasila Prathapan, Syamala Kumari, and Meenakshi TK are the respondents. The case involves an execution petition that was ultimately dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed as not pressed by the counsel for the decree holder.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, EP is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prasila Prathapan
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Syamala Kumari
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Meenakshi TK
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Tension Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Sheni P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
EP is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Counsel for Decree Holder made endorsement stating that EP is not pressed. Hence, EP is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Prasila Prathapan, Syamala Kumari et al regarding execution petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Prasila Prathapan, Syamala Kumari et al regarding execution petition.