Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 241/2023

Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Nabeesa C et al regarding execution petition.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Meera John K
Order Date
2025-08-19
Duration
Case Code No.
241
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd is the petitioner seeking execution against the respondents. The court dismissed the petition due to non-appearance of the respondents.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was dismissed due to the absence of the respondents despite opportunities given. The court found no grounds to proceed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed due to the absence of the respondents despite opportunities given. The court found no grounds to proceed.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the petition as the decree holder had no representation and did not take steps.
Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the petition as the decree holder had no representation and did not take steps.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that the decree holder had no representation and despite chances given, no steps were taken.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, EP is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nabeesa C
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rasiya PP
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chithra
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Tenison Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Execution Petition is dismissed for default due to no representation from the Decree Holder.
Evidence:
Decree Holder has no representation. Inspite of chances given, no steps are taken. Hence, EP is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kuruvattoor Service Co-Operative Bank vs Jabir PT regarding dismissal of execution petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between General Manager vs Mahasil Kundalangadan regarding EP proceedings.
Court of the Principal Munsiff – I, Kozhikode
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Ratheesan regarding EP dismissal.
Court of the Principal Munsiff – I
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Smt.Mirash V regarding balance amount and sale confirmation.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Shylaja M et al regarding settlement of decree.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won