Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 108/2022

Case between C Vasu et al vs MP Marshad et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Judge
Smt Meera John K
Order Date
2025-08-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners are C Vasu, Gopika Radhakrishnan, Pradeesh, and Radhika Sreejith, who have filed a Rent Control Petition. The respondents are MP Marshad, MP Misthah, and KT Hussain Kutty.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition is allowed in terms of the mediation report, which has been accepted by the court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition is allowed in terms of the mediation report, which has been accepted by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Terms of mediation report are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the same is accepted. Petition is allowed in terms of mediation report.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C Vasu
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopika Radhakrishnan
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pradeesh
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Radhika Sreejith
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
MP Marshad
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
MP Misthah
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
KT Hussain Kutty
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
NVP Rafeeque
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
KB Sivaramakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition is allowed in terms of mediation report.
Evidence:
Hence, the same is accepted. Petition is allowed in terms of mediation report.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the terms of the mediation report which the parties and their respective counsel signed.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between C Vasu et al vs MP Marshad et al regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between C Vasu et al vs MP Marshad et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs Ramesh Sait regarding Rent Control Petition
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between M.K. Bushara vs Devadas P. regarding Rent Control Petition
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheela vs The Chevayur Service Co operative Bank Ltd regarding rent control petition.
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Shoukath Ali et al vs Sunandakumari et al regarding Rent Control Petition
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Nanditha Sreekumar vs Nadira Bhanu K. regarding rent control petition
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won